‘You stole the game away from me’ – Major Wimbledon controversy as new technology FAILS and Kartal rival fumes at umpire

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

A FUMING tennis star accused Wimbledon of “stealing” a game from her after the electronic line-calling technology FAILED on Centre Court.

And she let rip at the chair umpire in never-seen-before scenes at Wimbledon in which she accused the tournament of BIAS.

GettyAnastasia Pavlyuchenkova fumed as she was denied a point when the Hawk-Eye live failed[/caption]

GettyThe Russian accused Wimbledon of favouritism for their home player Sonay Kartal[/caption]

BBCThere was no call despite the ball clearly bouncing beyond the baseline[/caption]

BBCPavlyuchenkova accused Wimbledon of bias[/caption]

BBCThe incident happened at 4-4 in the first set on Centre Court[/caption]

Sonay Kartal took on Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in the last 16.

But the Brit’s shot landed well out at advantage Pavlyuchenkova at 4-4 in the first set.

However, there was no call from the Hawk-Eye live system – which should automatically say “out” over the tannoy system – even though replays showed the ball had clearly bounced long.

The audio system then unexpectedly declared “stop, stop”, leaving players, the umpire and fans baffled.

German umpire Nico Helwerth called play to a halt, telling the crowd that “there is a problem” as he tried to get his head around the confusion.

Despite the Kartal shot clearly being out, it is understood there was no video replay available to the tennis umpire to overrule – but TV viewers on BBC were privy to watching the incident back.

And after nearly a three-minute delay during which time he got on the phone to work out what was happening, he eventually said: “The electronic system was unable to track the last point so it will be replayed.”

Therefore, a let was played, although Pavlyuchenkova should have had the game because the backhand landed out on game point.

CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS

Incredibly, to add to the drama, Brighton’s Kartal battled back and won the replayed point and then went on to break at a crucial stage of the opening set.

Pavlyuchenkova complained to the umpire when she returned to her seat.

She moaned: “I don’t know if it’s in or it’s out. How do I know?

“How can you prove it? Because she is local, they can say whatever.

“You took the game away from me.”

Helwerth replied: “If they tell me [inaudible] there’s nothing I can do.

“If they tell me we don’t have it, that’s the rule.”

But Pavlyuchenkova replied: “They stole the game from me, they stole it.”

A Wimbledon spokesman said: “Due to operator error the system was deactivated on the point in question. The chair umpire followed the established process.”

Pavlyuchenkova managed to regroup and break back immediately as Kartal served for the first set, even saving a set point.

And she forced a tie-break, winning it 7-3 after a 77-minute first set before wrapping up a 7-6 6-4 victory over the Brit in two hours and two minutes.

This is the first year of Wimbledon since the tournament ditched human line judges for the AI live system.

It meant that rather than the men and women calling the lines and players having the chance to challenge using Hawk-Eye retrospectively, the technology is supposed to use pre-recorded voices calling “fault”, “out” and “foot fault” immediately after the shots.

In a statement, the All England Club’s chief executive, Sally Bolton, said: “The decision to introduce Live Electronic Line Calling at The Championships was made following a significant period of consideration and consultation.

“Having reviewed the results of the testing undertaken at The Championships this year, we consider the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating.

“For the players, it will offer them the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour.

“We take our responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon very seriously.

“Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at The Championships for many decades and we recognise their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.”

BBCThere was confusion for everyone inside Centre Court[/caption]

BBCThe umpire tried to get to the bottom of the situation[/caption]

ReutersSonay Kartal benefited from the controversy but lost the first set[/caption] Creator – [#item_custom_dc:creator]

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TOP STORIES