GARY NEVILLE has outlined his six “non-negotiables” after it emerged that the Glazers have snubbed Sheikh Jassim’s Manchester United takeover offer.
The Qatari bid to buy the entire club has collapsed with the Glazer family instead set to sell a 25 per cent minority stake to Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
GettyGary Neville has responded to goings on at Old Trafford[/caption]
PASir Jim Ratcliffe is set to buy 25 per cent of the Red Devils[/caption]
INEOS chief Ratcliffe’s bid is set to be given the green light when United bosses meet next week.
Neville, 48, had been a proponent for the Glazers making a full United exit.
In the wake of news that they are set to stick around, – which has left fans calling in one of the ‘”club’s darkest days” – the former full-back posted a lengthy tweet in response.
Outlining his six “non-negotiables”, he wrote: “The news last night of the Qatari withdrawal leaves Manchester United on the brink of a minority investment.
“Can this really work and what impact will it have on a struggling organisation?
“It’s worth setting out my non-negotiables on a takeover of Manchester United that I made over a year ago.
“1. A new sporting project.
“2. A new or redeveloped Old Trafford.
CASINO SPECIAL – BEST CASINO WELCOME OFFERS
Sheikh Jassim has withdrawn his bid
Fans were desperate for a full sale
“3. A New training ground.
“4. Full redevelopment of the surrounding land to create a Manchester United World and amazing fan experience.
“5. Pay off the debt and stop taking dividends until the above is done.”
He then added his sixth in response to events in recent years, continuing: “6. The club requires leadership that is statesmanlike on major issues that enables a fairer, more inclusive and diverse game.
“Leadership that builds a positive environment and culture whilst adhering to the club’s values and principles and one that is willing to make tough decisions to prevent an erosion in the club’s public image.
“How does a minority stakeholder positively impact the club to achieve the above? Can a minority shareholder have any impact on the above. It leaves more questions than answers.
“My preference is and always will be now for a Glazer family full exit. They have overstayed their welcome in Manchester yet seem oblivious to this fact.”
Neville then outlined his 16 questions that he feels fans would like answered by the Glazers.
They included whether any family members will leave the board, who ultimately will possess sporting control, and whether further debt will be placed upon the club.
The pundit also mused whether Old Trafford will finally be modernised following Ratcliffe’s investment.
Ratcliffe, 70, is set to undergo a 100-day review of Man United when his bid is given the green light.
He is said to be set on implementing a new structure at the club, with a new transfer chief possibly being appointed.
Gary Neville’s 16 questions
1. What does the distribution of funds look like? Is all the cash being taken out of the club?
2. Which Glazers are going or is it a family dilution?
3. How does it impact the NYSE shareholders?
4. Does the executive stay the same?
5. Does the sporting side stay the same above the manager?
6. Who within the board has sporting control?
7. Are there future dilution clauses with the Glazer family in any deal you do as a minority shareholder? When are they?
8. We’re maxed out on the credit card and debt. How is this deal going to change the capital structure and financial issues the club has?
9. Is any further debt being placed on the club?
10. Is any debt being paid off?
11. How does this deal impact the board composition?
12. How does a minority shareholder impact the negative culture within the entire organisation?
13. Old Trafford is tired and is in need of significant redevelopment. How does this deal resolve this issue?
14. Will this deal allow the development of the training ground to its required standard?
15. Old Trafford requires significant investment on its surrounding land. Does this deal impact this requirement positively or does it leave it as a concrete wasteland?
16. How does a minority shareholder stop cultural decline across a whole organisation if the people who have overseen this decline still have a majority shareholding?
Creator – [#item_custom_dc:creator]
